<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV: Apples&#8217; Next Conquest &#8211; It&#8217;s the Buttons Stupid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darrenrush.com/2009/05/tv-apples-next-conquest-its-the-buttons-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darrenrush.com/2009/05/tv-apples-next-conquest-its-the-buttons-stupid/</link>
	<description>random thoughts on the interweb</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 21:49:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: drush</title>
		<link>http://darrenrush.com/2009/05/tv-apples-next-conquest-its-the-buttons-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-3147</link>
		<dc:creator>drush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 03:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darrenrush.com/?p=25#comment-3147</guid>
		<description>Is that THE John B? 
 
Details on the next gen of the AppleTV are leaking:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/the-next-apple-tv-revealed-cloud-storage-and-iphone-os-on-tap/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/the-next-apple...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
Following Apple&#039;s minimalistic design aesthetic, they are &#039;taking away&#039; local storage, and maybe doing even more on the remote. 
 
Your comments re: kids is a good one, but easily solved with an iPad cover.  The possibility of using an iPad to browse live video TV and film previews is super exciting - live video on the remote has never been possible, even with the top-of-the-line Logitech Harmony series remotes. 
 
GoogleTV is a step in the right direction, but I&#039;m in the camp that thinks Google will be chasing Apple with Android and every other non-ad product they try to go after for the next 15 years - but that is for another post. 
 
One more comment on the iPad - more than a personal device, I think of it as a coffee-table device.  It is a bridge for application developers to work on bigger displays - to ultimately get to the TV.  iPad Scrabble and the iPhone Scrabble Tile Rack are a great example of how apps for the family might totally change the way people think about the TV. 
 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that THE John B? </p>
<p>Details on the next gen of the AppleTV are leaking:  <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/the-next-apple-tv-revealed-cloud-storage-and-iphone-os-on-tap/" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/the-next-apple.." rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/the-next-apple..</a>. </p>
<p>Following Apple&#039;s minimalistic design aesthetic, they are &#039;taking away&#039; local storage, and maybe doing even more on the remote. </p>
<p>Your comments re: kids is a good one, but easily solved with an iPad cover.  The possibility of using an iPad to browse live video TV and film previews is super exciting &#8211; live video on the remote has never been possible, even with the top-of-the-line Logitech Harmony series remotes. </p>
<p>GoogleTV is a step in the right direction, but I&#039;m in the camp that thinks Google will be chasing Apple with Android and every other non-ad product they try to go after for the next 15 years &#8211; but that is for another post. </p>
<p>One more comment on the iPad &#8211; more than a personal device, I think of it as a coffee-table device.  It is a bridge for application developers to work on bigger displays &#8211; to ultimately get to the TV.  iPad Scrabble and the iPhone Scrabble Tile Rack are a great example of how apps for the family might totally change the way people think about the TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nachofault</title>
		<link>http://darrenrush.com/2009/05/tv-apples-next-conquest-its-the-buttons-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-3146</link>
		<dc:creator>nachofault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 03:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darrenrush.com/?p=25#comment-3146</guid>
		<description>You must not have kids.  iPad as a remote?  What parent would want to risk that?  Plus it&#039;s too cumbersome to deal with while watching tv.  I agree (I assume) that the television experience must be personalizable (is that a word?), but it needs to be sleek and extremely simple...almost non-existent. 
 
The lack of innovation from Apple in this space is shameful.  I think GoogleTV is a step in the right direction and is more inline with what you originally stated...but I don&#039;t think it is a game changer.  That being said I do think Jobs was going to let AppleTV die, but now that Google is in the game and will release a much superior product...I bet that Apple changes course and goes all out.  Though Android&#039;s popularity and rapidly evolving OS may not allow Jobs to completely focus on AppleTV. 
 
Thoughts? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must not have kids.  iPad as a remote?  What parent would want to risk that?  Plus it&#39;s too cumbersome to deal with while watching tv.  I agree (I assume) that the television experience must be personalizable (is that a word?), but it needs to be sleek and extremely simple&#8230;almost non-existent. </p>
<p>The lack of innovation from Apple in this space is shameful.  I think GoogleTV is a step in the right direction and is more inline with what you originally stated&#8230;but I don&#39;t think it is a game changer.  That being said I do think Jobs was going to let AppleTV die, but now that Google is in the game and will release a much superior product&#8230;I bet that Apple changes course and goes all out.  Though Android&#39;s popularity and rapidly evolving OS may not allow Jobs to completely focus on AppleTV. </p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drush</title>
		<link>http://darrenrush.com/2009/05/tv-apples-next-conquest-its-the-buttons-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>drush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darrenrush.com/?p=25#comment-415</guid>
		<description>The current Apple TV device gives them a chance to really try things out and start establishing those deals.  Working with that group with be a good starting point, even though adoption is so-so now, a new integrated-TV could really explode.  Having some pre-existing, maybe exclusive content distro deals on the Apple/iTunes/TV platform could be really interesting at that point.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current Apple TV device gives them a chance to really try things out and start establishing those deals.  Working with that group with be a good starting point, even though adoption is so-so now, a new integrated-TV could really explode.  Having some pre-existing, maybe exclusive content distro deals on the Apple/iTunes/TV platform could be really interesting at that point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://darrenrush.com/2009/05/tv-apples-next-conquest-its-the-buttons-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 06:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darrenrush.com/?p=25#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Ha!  You weren&#039;t kidding, you really have spent a lot of time thinking about this! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  You weren&#039;t kidding, you really have spent a lot of time thinking about this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deanna McD</title>
		<link>http://darrenrush.com/2009/05/tv-apples-next-conquest-its-the-buttons-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>Deanna McD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 04:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darrenrush.com/?p=25#comment-372</guid>
		<description>Does this mean I need to wait to buy another computer?  Actually, this is so intriguing!  Are any deals being made with content creators that you know of? You can&#039;t sell an empty pipeline. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean I need to wait to buy another computer?  Actually, this is so intriguing!  Are any deals being made with content creators that you know of? You can&#039;t sell an empty pipeline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
